Skip to main content

Why should we pay with the blood of election officials?

Indonesia election: More than 270 election staff die counting votes 


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48083051

( Source: BBC News)

Commentary

When the promise of a pound of flesh
cut right from the chest of a debtor-merchant
was made, Shylock was overjoyed
In Shakespeare words, Shylock was excited
 at the prospect of seeing some blood, as he quipped
"What a righteous judge"!
But the blood of 270 election officials
Literally cut off from close to their hearts
while conducting an election
Oh! our world cannot see more evil
In a world where 
voters could be accredited electronically
Votes cast through a varied of electronic means
And collation and counting done using technology
With humans reserved as the final arbiter, in case of doubt
The blood of election officials is a sacrifice
Too great to be made!

© 2019. Felix O. Omosele

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2023 Presidential Poll and Electronic transmission of votes: Of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

(Source: NicePNG) Commentary A thoroughbred gentleman by day  But a serial thief by night So goes the identity of Dr Jekyll/Mr Hyde A tale of confused identities and shades of interpretation   Should INEC have transmitted votes in real time? Must they use the BVAS to upload  IReV?   The Electoral Act( s 60(5)) says INEC should prescribe a method for the transfer( a discretion) INEC then prescribe a method via its own Guidelines(clause 38) Alas! We are now hearing different stories Some(infact the Senate's President) says  "transmission was not intended" Others says that the Guidelines do not equate a statute(Of course we know that!) But was there not a cause?( Using King David's voice in the scripture - 1 Sam 17:29) What was the mischief before the amendment of the Electoral Act? Widespread manipulation of figures::: Civil societies clamour for electoral reform (see:  https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/1557141800105977864/9088754853959935674 ) Stakehol...